data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/37b42/37b423a7dd979b7aeb18bc107e0e1721ba8a3682" alt=""
Of course, the first thing to walk out the door when evolution is considered as the more tenable explanation for the origin of man is the historicity of the one whom the Bible calls "the first man" (1 Cor. 15:45), Adam: "Was Adam an Historical Person? And What Difference Does It Make?" If Adam is merely a creature of mythology, then the biblical-historical account of the Fall did not actually happen, we were not created by God as good (Gen 1:31), and there never was a need for Christ to take on humanity in His redemptive work. In short, the whole of biblical Christianity disentangles and dissipates.
See also: Theistic Evolution: A Hermeneutical Trojan Horse
No comments:
Post a Comment